Detailed tests were completed on 15 different product comparisons with the university, government, and private companies (80K to 8M records). Download this comparison chart to see how Data Ladder compared with IBM Quality Stage, SAS Dataflux, and in-house solutions in terms of
- Match accuracy
- Software speed
- Time to first result
- Purchasing/license cost
| Features of the solution | Data Ladder | IBM Quality Stage | SAS Dataflux | In-House Solutions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match Accuracy (Between 40K to 8M record samples) | 96% | 91% | 84% | 65-85% |
| Software Speed | Very Fast | Fast | Fast | Slow |
| Purchase / Licensing Costs | 80-95% below the competition | $370K+ | $220K+ | $250K+ |
| Time to First Result | 15 Minutes | 2 Months+ | 2 Months+ | 3 Months+ |
| Comments | The tests above were completed on 15 different product comparisons with universities, government, and private companies (80K to 8M records). This includes the effect of false positives. | Need multi-threared, in memory, so-sql processing to optimize for speed and accuracy. Speed is important, the more match terations you can run, the more accurate your results will be. | Include base license costs, 2014 proces or later, in-house, includes salary benefits. Not in-house implementations had lost the member who ran and understood the matching program. | A metric for ease of use. This is the time of first result, not necessarily full cleansing. |
